Wednesday, April 24, 2024

Teach Out Reflection

For my teach-out project, I landed on the idea of having a one-on-one conversation with my Dad on the subject of white privilege. The concept surrounding white privilege was something I had an idea of before taking this class, but not a complete understanding. The very same could be said for my dad– he is a very relaxed guy, liberal leaning, but not necessarily someone active in that political space. The only times such sensitive topics such as race and white privilege appear is at the dinner table. My dad is also a teacher, and time and time again has experienced diversity seminars at his school. This is important, since he and I both teach in a very diverse district. However, these seminars, especially those focused on the subject of whiteness, rubbed him the wrong way. At dinner, my dad would complain he didn’t like being targeted for being a “white old man”, and didn’t understand why– he isn’t racist, and in his words did not actively use being white to his advantage. After learning what I’ve learned in this course, I realized that my dad would really benefit from a complete understanding of white privilege. I thought, if I could just talk to him honestly about it, instead of being talked down to in a seminar, maybe that barrier could be broken, and we could have an open discussion on white privilege and what it means.

I chose two materials for this teach out: Alan Johnson’s Privilege, Power, and Difference, and Mellody Hobson’s color brave TED talk. Both share similar ideas on the subject of not being a part of culturally dominant groups. They make it clear that there are dominant groups in the United States, brought to life by social constructs meant to keep white people in power. Important too, was the fact that these materials stress taking ourselves personally out of the equation when discussing it– the issue of white privilege is less about us as individuals, and more so about the groups we belong to. How we as white people obviously benefit from being so– we have to worry far less about being stopped in a store, or being pulled over, or attaining better career paths. Where there is privilege, there is oppression. White privilege has more to do with how we are treated by the people surrounding us than it does ourselves personally. These ideas made a big impact on me when I first learned of them in this class, which is part of why I chose these two materials in particular. I also chose the Mellody Hobson TED talk because I knew this was a video my dad definitely watched in one of his school’s diversity seminars. I wondered if he would have a different perspective on it after the first part of my teach out.

The teach out itself went great. We started with a discussion on what we believed white privilege was. My dad understood that it meant white people had certain advantages they could utilize. He believed that his age group was a target of diversity seminar because the “pendulum was swinging the other way”-- meaning, socially underprivileged groups are finally getting exposure, but with this “extreme” comes unnecessary targeting. My dad reasoned things would eventually even out again, and his group wouldn’t be targeted. Part of what I learned in this class was actually meeting someone at their level. Instead of telling him that he was outright wrong, I instead got to the root of why he was feeling what he was feeling. Once that is exposed, it is possible to break down that understanding bit by bit. From here we talked a little bit about popular media depictions of representation, how every show has a diverse cast now. I reasoned with him that while that may be true, media depictions might not necessarily represent real struggle. If things were truly “evening out”, I don’t think we would still be fighting for LGBTQ rights or fighting against the censorship of history. We also talked about shows that he grew up with, and what they say about white privilege– why was it that the white main character of “All in the Family” was allowed to be a racist bigot? Would the show have been greenlit in the first place if it was instead a black main character?

From here, I brought out the Alan Johnson reading and explained his key ideas– unearned privilege, the nature of obliviously benefitting from white privilege without actively “using” it, the Diversity Wheel. I tried to reason how we would be treated differently if we were a different race, and how this unequal treatment is a result of our own cultural pedagogies benefitting white privilege. He was apt to listen, which was motivating. Finally, we watched Mellody Hobson’s TED talk, which I have mentioned, we have both watched before, but I wanted to see if he would have a new perspective on it after our talk.

Following the teach out, my dad said I did a great job explaining it. He said that I did a better job of it than even the diversity seminars at his school! This fact I wasn’t really surprised by; after experiencing one in my district, it doesn’t help that the people teaching these don’t really care about the subject either. My dad said he had a far more complete understanding of what it meant, and how our privilege leads to another group being oppressed. We talked further about how this info was important, especially teaching in such a diverse school district. He pointed out how much of his school’s faculty was exclusively white, and we talked about what that says about white privilege, and opportunities. At the end of our conversation, he asked me what he could do, if he had no control over being old and white in this current system. I told him to simply talk about it– as Alan Johnson put it, the first step in solving a problem is addressing a problem to begin with. I hope my teach out had a lasting impact on my dad.

Thank you for such a great class! It was really enlightening and refreshing to talk about these subjects in such an open and honest space. I hope everyone has a good rest of their year!


Monday, April 1, 2024

Week 10- Eliminating Ableism in Education

Going into this reading, I wasn't sure what to expect. I had heard the terms "ableist" and "ableism" thrown around before, but I didn't really have the context for those words. I understand now this relates to disabilities and how disability is treated in our society. I am certain this reading has more to do with how it is presented in a classroom setting and interpersonally, but I was also thinking about how navigating around a school is a possible issue promoting ableism. In my school alone, there are no ramps or elevators inside the building-- students who have an injured leg have to stay in a single room all day. I know these Rhode Island schools were built many years ago, but the fact that such considerations were not standard or to code, even in the 1950s and 1960s, is honestly mind boggling. It really wasn't that long ago!!

"Ableist Assumptions"

  • "Penny was quickly developing the view, held by most disability advocates, that while disability is not a tragedy, society's response to disability can have tragic consequences for those who have disabilities" (p. 2)
  • It's clear from this parent's experience that society's expectations of the disabled are not of success, but of failure. If students are placed in this mindset or set against such low standards, how do our systems ever expect them to succeed?
  • From this same section, it's clear too that not only does society not offer the same protections to disabled students as regular ones, but any protections that are in place are completely obfuscated. Why did Penny have to learn about laws protecting her child from discriminaiton from a second-hand source? Shouldn't this have been one of the first things presented to Penny by her doctors or local school district?
"Ableism and Schooling"
  • "In short, in the eyes of many educators and society, it is preferable for disabled students to do things in the same manner as non-disabled kids" (p. 3)
  • Somehow, society both places low expectations on disabled students, while at the same time expecting them to act and perform in the same way as non-disabled students? There should be a greater focus on the strengths of the student, not the so-called "weaknesses". How can we help disabled students succeed in their own way, express themselves in their own way?
  • "Both of these dominant stereotypes of disability, "Tiny Tims" and "supercrips," have at their core ableist perspectives, the failure to accept and value disabled people as they are" (p. 4)
"Education of the Deaf"
  • "...there is significant history and research to draw on that should guide our efforts to improve education for the deaf" (p. 5)
  • Again I see the recurring theme of applying societal, ableist standards onto disabled youth. Oralism was clearly a pushback against the success of sign language and other such programs. To read that the inventor of the telephone--who had a deaf wife-- fighting to BAN sign language is... shocking. There must have been lead in that 1800s water, I swear.
  • "...only 30 percent of speech can be read from lip movements" (p. 6)
  • I'm glad that ASL became commonplace in the later half of the 1900s. It allows deaf students to succeed in their own way, as opposed to applying our own standards.
"Toward Ending Ableism in Education"
  • "As is the case with racism and sexism, progress towards equity is dependent first and foremost on the acknowledgement that ableism exists in schools"
  • "Though students with disabilities have individual needs, by and large their education should be based on the same cirriculum as that of nondisabled students"
  • The big takeaway I am gaining is that awareness is a large factor in removing ableism, but also having resources to assist disabled students in their goals and education is paramount. There is no one size fits all solution-- each student must be given specialized assistance
Heir argues that ableism projects unrealistic expectations onto students with disabilities. Society's failure to prop up and support individuals who are disabled starts in the schooling systems. The best way to combat and change this mentality is to better specialize education to support the needs of disabled individuals, as well as promoting general diversity among student populations.

Reading this, I was reminded that former president of the US FDR was in a wheelchair. I was shocked to learn that his presence in a wheelchair was totally hidden from the American public until after the fact-- I wonder if he had publically spoken about it, it would have promoted a more inclusive mindset in the American populace. Such struggles could have been normalized and supported... but those were different times. His team may have worried that he wouldn't be taken seriously in a wheelchair.



Teach Out Reflection

For my teach-out project, I landed on the idea of having a one-on-one conversation with my Dad on the subject of white privilege. The conc...